Why the study?
Understanding the phenotypes and geographic distributions associated with the highest risk of premature cardiovascular mortality is critical to targeting interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning identified distinct county-level phenotypes of premature cardiovascular mortality, highlighting that the highest risk is concentrated in impoverished areas of the American South, emphasizing the need for geographically tailored, phenotype-specific interventions.
Disparities in premature cardiovascular mortality (PCVM) have been associated with socioeconomic, behavioral, and environmental risk factors. Understanding the "phenotypes", or combinations of characteristics associated with the highest risk of PCVM, and the geographic distributions of these phenotypes is critical to targeting PCVM interventions. This study applied the classification and regression tree (CART) to identify county phenotypes of PCVM and geographic information systems to examine the distributions of identified phenotypes. Random forest analysis was applied to evaluate the relative importance of risk factors associated with PCVM. The CART analysis identified seven county phenotypes of PCVM, where high-risk phenotypes were characterized by having greater percentages of people with lower income, higher physical inactivity, and higher food insecurity. These high-risk phenotypes were mostly concentrated in the Black Belt of the American South and the Appalachian region. The random forest analysis identified additional important risk factors associated with PCVM, including broadband access, smoking, receipt of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, and educational attainment. Our study demonstrates the use of machine learning approaches in characterizing community-level phenotypes of PCVM. Interventions to reduce PCVM should be tailored according to these phenotypes in corresponding geographic areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: