This multimethod study generated and tested a “best evidence” model of school improvement processes (SIP) capable of improving student achievement. Initially developed through the review of a comprehensive body of previous empirical research, the model was further refined through a 2, 5-year longitudinal study in 10 schools. A quantitative test of this refined model was then conducted using survey evidence from administrators, teachers, parents, and students in 100 elementary schools. The model as a whole explained modest but significant amounts of variation in student achievement across schools. School leadership and SIP implementation processes accounted for the largest proportion of explained variation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leithwood et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: