This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We propose a novel explanation method that explains the decisions of a deep neural network by investigating how the intermediate representations at each layer of the deep network were refined during the training process. This way we can a) find the most influential training examples during training and b) analyze which classes attributed most to the final representation. Our method is general: it can be wrapped around any iterative optimization procedure and covers a variety of neural network architectures, including feed-forward networks and convolutional neural networks. We first propose a method for stochastic training with single training instances, but continue to also derive a variant for the common mini-batch training. In experimental evaluations, we show that our method identifies highly representative training instances that can be used as an explanation. Additionally, we propose a visualization that provides explanations in the form of aggregated statistics over the whole training process.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfahler et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: