BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of helmets in providing protection against ocular trauma during road traffic accidents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative observational study on ocular trauma due to road traffic accidents. We collected data from 100 patients. Patients in Group A had 50 cases of road traffic accidents while using helmets, and patients in Group B had 50 cases of road traffic accidents without helmets. The demographics, ocular parameters, type of injury, and severity of injury were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 100 patients evaluated, 30% had subconjunctival haemorrhage (SCH), among which 90% were not using helmets. Similarly, 21% presented with ecchymosis; among them, 95% were riding without a helmet. 18% presented with a cut lacerated wound, all of whom were not using a helmet. There were 13% of patients with lid tears, and all did not use a helmet. 23% had abrasions: in this subgroup, 82.6% didn’t use helmets (p = 0.000). 2% of patients suffered globe rupture, and neither wore a helmet. CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents, especially while riding a two-wheeler, are a significant and growing cause of blindness. Helmets and visors are paramount to avoid substantial visual loss in road traffic accidents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: