Key result
Controlling five major risk factors is linked to averting ~50% of strokes.
Cohort (n=1,730)
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the frequency of inadequately treated risk factors in a large representative cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA and to estimate the proportion of events potentially avertable by guideline-compliant preventive therapy compared to the status quo. METHODS: A total of 1,730 patients from the Poststroke Disease Management STROKE-CARD trial (NCT02156778) were recruited between 2014 and 2017. We focused on 8 risk conditions amenable to drug therapy and 3 lifestyle risk behaviors and assessed pre-event risk factor control in retrospect. The estimated degree of stroke preventability ranged from 0.4% (95% CI 0.2%-0.6%) to 13.7% (95% CI 12.2%-15.2%) for the individual risk factors. Adequate control of the 5 most relevant risk factors combined (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, atrial fibrillation, smoking, and overweight) would have averted ≈1 of 2 events or 1 in 4 with a highly conservative computation approach. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the existence of a considerable gap between risk factor control recommended by guidelines and real-world stroke prevention. Our study intends to increase awareness among physicians about stroke preventability and provides a quantitative basis for the emerging discussion on how to best tackle this challenge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boehme et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in acute ischemic stroke or TIA (n=1,730). Adequate risk factor control vs. Status quo (inadequately treated risk factors) was evaluated on Estimated degree of stroke preventability (p=< 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: