Why the study?
Does biological aspirin resistance increase the risk of new ischemic lesions on follow-up imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Does biological aspirin resistance increase the risk of new ischemic lesions on follow-up imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Biological aspirin resistance in the acute stage of ischemic stroke is independently associated with the development of new ischemic lesions on early follow-up imaging.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform risk stratification in acute stroke; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin is a primary antiplatelet agent for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. However, if aspirin fails to inhibit platelet function, as is expected in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), it may increase the rate of early clinical events. Therefore, we sought to determine whether aspirin resistance in the acute stage was associated with early radiological events, including new ischemic lesions (NILs). METHODS: This study was a single-center, prospective, observational study conducted between April 2012 and May 2013. Aspirin 300 mg was initially administered followed by maintenance doses of 100 mg daily. The acute aspirin reaction unit (aARU) was consistently measured after 3 hours of aspirin loading. An aARU value ≥550 IU was defined as biological aspirin resistance (BAR). NILs on follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were defined as lesions separate from index lesions, which were not detected on the initial DWI. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients were analyzed in this study. BAR in aARU was detected in 60 patients (16.3%). On follow-up DWI, 81 patients (22.1%) had NILs, which were frequently in the same territory as the index lesions (79%), pial infarcts (61.7%), and located within the cortex (59.3%). BAR was independently associated with NILs on follow-up DWI (adjusted OR 2.00, 95% CIs 1.01-3.96; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, BAR in aARU could be associated with NILs on follow-up DWI in AIS. Therefore, a further prospective study with a longer follow-up period is necessary to evaluate the clinical implications of aARU in AIS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: