Key result
Aerobic exercise outperforms Pilates and controls in improving cardiometabolic risk profiles over 12 weeks.
Why the study?
Does Pilates or aerobic exercise improve metabolic and cardiovascular indicators in pre-menopausal women with metabolic syndrome?
RCT (n=60)
randomly assigned
Does Pilates or aerobic exercise improve metabolic and cardiovascular indicators in pre-menopausal women with metabolic syndrome?
Both Pilates and aerobic exercise improve metabolic syndrome parameters in pre-menopausal women, but aerobic exercise shows superior effects on cardiovascular and lipid regulation.
Background and purpose Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major global health concern associated with increased cardiovascular risk. While various exercise interventions are recommended, their comparative effectiveness and underlying impact on metabolic regulation remain insufficiently clarified. This study aimed to compare the effects of aerobic exercise and Pilates on key metabolic and cardiovascular indicators in pre-menopausal women with MetS. Materials and Methods Sixty pre-menopausal women (aged 35–45 years; BMI 30–35 kg/m²) diagnosed with MetS were randomly assigned to three groups: control, Pilates, and aerobic exercise. Over 12 weeks, intervention groups followed structured exercise programs alongside lifestyle recommendations. Outcome measures included BMI, waist circumference, mean arterial pressure, and lipid profile. Results Both exercise interventions significantly improved all measured parameters compared to the control condition (p<0.001). However, aerobic exercise demonstrated superior effects across most metabolic indicators, suggesting a stronger influence on cardiovascular and lipid regulation mechanisms. Conclusion The findings indicate that while both exercise modalities are effective, aerobic exercise may play a more pronounced role in modulating key components of metabolic syndrome. These results support the prioritization of aerobic interventions in rehabilitation strategies and suggest broader implications for optimizing exercise-based approaches to metabolic health beyond the studied population. Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) (No. PACTR202403566263718).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thabet et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Metabolic Syndrome (n=60). Pilates exercise and Aerobic exercise vs. Control was evaluated on BMI, waist circumference, mean arterial pressure, and lipid profile (p=<0.001). Both Pilates and aerobic exercise significantly improved metabolic and cardiovascular indicators compared to control (p<0.001), with aerobic exercise demonstrating superior effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: