Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We consider a particular instance of user interactions in the Bitcoin network, that of interactions among wallet addresses belonging to scammers. Aggregation of multiple inputs and change addresses are common heuristics used to establish relationships among addresses and analyze transaction amounts in the Bitcoin network. We propose a flow centric approach that complements such heuristics, by studying the branching, merger and propagation of Bitcoin flows. We study a recent sextortion campaign by exploring the ego network of known offending wallet addresses. We compare and combine different existing and new heuristics, which allows us to identify (1) Bitcoin addresses of interest (including possible recurrent go-to addresses for the scammers) and (2) relevant Bitcoin flows, from scam Bitcoin addresses to a Binance exchange and to other other scam addresses, that suggest connections among prima facie disparate waves of similar scams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oggier et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: