Why the study?
Does removal of postectopic heart rate turbulence improve the accuracy of heart rate variability measures and arrhythmic event prediction in post-AMI patients with LVEF ≤ 0.40?
Does removal of postectopic heart rate turbulence improve the accuracy of heart rate variability measures and arrhythmic event prediction in post-AMI patients with LVEF ≤ 0.40?
Editing out heart rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats significantly alters heart rate variability measures and improves the prediction of arrhythmic events in post-AMI patients.
HR turbulence removal may refine ULF-based arrhythmic prediction post-AMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) turbulence lasting up to 15 beats after ventricular premature beats (VPBs) may have profound effects on HR variability measures. Aim of this study was to examine the effects of HR turbulence on HR variability measures. METHODS: We developed an algorithm, which deletes 15 consecutive RR intervals after VPBs and examined the effects of the HR turbulence removal on the HR variability measures in patients after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Two hundred and sixty seven patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 0.40 and occurrence of VPBs were included in the study. Differences (%) between original HR data and HR turbulence edited data were compared. RESULTS: HR turbulence editing had variable effects on different HR variability indexes. Ultra low (ULF) and very low frequency (VLF) spectral components were mostly affected by the HR turbulence removal. Both ULF and VLF decreased significantly both at baseline Holter recordings (ULF: P = 0.006, VLF: P = 0.031) and at 6 weeks from AMI (ULF: P < 0.001, VLF: P = 0.001). The number of VPBs had a marked influence on results, e.g., when the number of VPBs exceeded the highest decile (≈50 VPBs/hour), the ULF and VLF spectral component were >30% lower after removal of turbulence. In addition, the prediction of arrhythmic events by ULF component improved after turbulence removal (AUC: 0.69 ->0.74). CONCLUSIONS: HR turbulence affects HR variability measures, especially the ULF and VFL spectral components. Editing of the HR turbulence should be considered when HR variability is measured from Holter recordings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peltola et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: