Why the study?
Does hypoxia combined with graded venous occlusion alter hemodynamic responses during low-intensity cycling exercise in healthy adults?
Does hypoxia combined with graded venous occlusion alter hemodynamic responses during low-intensity cycling exercise in healthy adults?
During low-intensity exercise, sympathetically mediated increases in blood pressure due to hypoxia may override responses mediated by the ergoreflex at low venous occlusion pressures.
May inform sympathetic control during hypoxic exercise; leaves open ergoreflex-chemoreflex interactions for prospective study.
Activation of group III/IV skeletal muscle afferents (ergoreflex) and hypoxia (chemoreflex) are two potent stimuli of the sympathetic nervous system during exercise. Venous distention by graded sub‐systolic occlusion contributes to the ergoreflex during exercise. Although the ergoreflex causes greater increases in blood pressure (BP) compared with the chemoreflex, the interaction of the ergoreflex and hypoxia during lower extremity dynamic exercise is unknown. Objective To determine the effect of hypoxia and graded cuff occlusion on hemodynamic responses during low‐intensity cycling exercise. Methods 19 healthy adults (9 men, 25±5 yr) completed two sessions. Session 1 included a maximal cycle ergometry exercise test. Session 2 included two randomized bouts (hypoxia: 12.5% FiO 2 and normoxia: 21% FiO 2 ) of constant‐load cycling at 30% peak workload for 3 min (control, CTL) followed by randomized inflation of bilateral thigh pressure tourniquets to 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 mmHg for 2 min with 2 min of deflation between occlusions. The bouts were separated by 30 minutes of rest. Blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac output (CO) were measured continuously. Results During hypoxia, the average SPO 2 was 80%. Venous occlusion and hypoxia had differential effects on mean arterial pressure (MAP, occlusion × hypoxia, p=0.02). Significant increases of MAP from CTL occurred at 60 (Δ9 ± 6mmHg), 80 (Δ15 ± 8mmHg), and 100mmHg (Δ17 ± 9mmHg) under normoxia (p<0.05). MAP only increased at 100mmHg (Δ14 ± 9mmHg) under hypoxia (p<0.05). Under hypoxia, MAP was much greater at CTL and 20mmHg as compared to normoxia (p<0.05). SBP exhibited responses similar to MAP under hypoxia (100mmHg increase, p<0.001, occlusion × hypoxia interaction, p=0.02). CO was greater with venous occlusion as mediated by increases in HR (p<0.001). In addition, CO increased under hypoxia (p=0.007) but had no interaction with venous occlusion. Conclusion During low pressure venous occlusion, hypoxia had a greater effect on BP, but as pressure increased (60–100mmHg), there were no significant differences in BP between normoxia and hypoxia. Therefore, sympathetically mediated increases of BP during exercise attributed to hypoxia may negate any responses mediated by the ergoreflex when elicited by venous occlusion at low pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chantigian et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: