The non-classical zirconium carbonyl complexes Cp2∗Zr(η2-E2)(CO) (E S, Se, Te) have been prepared by the reactions of Cp2∗Zr(CO)2 with the elemental chalcogens (ca. two equivalents) at ca. 80°C. Cp2∗Zr(η2-E2)(CO) are characterized by νCO stretching frequencies of 2057 cm−1 (E S), 2037 cm−1 (E Se) and 2006 cm−1 (E Te), and the ditellurido derivative Cp2∗Zr(η2-Te2)(CO) has been structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction. The dichalcogenido-carbonyl complexes Cp2∗Zr(η2-E2)(CO) (E S, Se, Te) react further with excess chalcogen to give the trichalcogenido complexes Cp2∗Zr(η2-E2), which have also been structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction. The formation of the tritellurido complex Cp2∗Zr(η2-Te3) is reversible, and addition of CO (1 atm) regenerates Cp2∗Zr(η2-Te)(CO). In the presence of pyridine, the dichalcogenido derivatives Cp2∗Zr(η2-E2)(CO) react with Cp2∗Zr(CO)2 to give the terminal chalcogenido complexes Cp2∗Zr(E)(NC5H5). Cp2∗Zr(η2-Te2)(CO) exists in both triclinic and tetragonal modifications. Interestingly, the derived ZrCO bond lengths for the two structures were significantly different, while the CO bond lengths for each structure were similar. The origin of the discrepancy was determined to be crystallographic disorder in the tetragonal modification, and appropriate modelling allowed the derivation of a reasonable ZrCO bond length for the tetragonal form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howard et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: