Objective: Narcissistic leaders' engagement in strategies of dominance and/or prestige at different times across their leadership tenure could explain why they are perceived favorably as leaders early on, and unfavorably later on.Method: Over a 12-week period, we found that narcissism was positively associated with peer-rated leadership during initial group formation, but not later.Results: Dominance and prestige mediated these initial positive perceptions of narcissists as leaders.However, neither dominance nor prestige mediated the relationship between narcissism and leadership later on.Conclusions: The findings highlight a mechanistic role for dominance and prestige in explaining the rise and fall of narcissistic leaders over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ong et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: