Why the study?
Does enterovirus infection increase the risk of asthma in young children?
Does enterovirus infection increase the risk of asthma in young children?
Enterovirus infection in young children is associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequently developing asthma.
EV infection may raise childhood asthma risk; leaves open causality and need for prospective trials before any clinical action.
BACKGROUND: We conducted a cohort study to determine the relationship between enterovirus (EV) infection and asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, we identified patients who received a new diagnosis of asthma and concurrent treatment between January 2000 and December 2011 (EV cohort: n = 208 213; non-EV cohort: n = 208 213). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine and compare the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of asthma between these 2 cohorts. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to assess the differences in the cumulative incidence curves of asthma between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: The overall aHR of asthma was 1.48-fold higher in the EV cohort than in the non-EV cohort (95% confidence interval = 1.45-1.50). The aHR of asthma was higher in the EV cohort than in the non-EV cohort, comprising children aged ≤5 years, regardless of sex, sociodemographic factors (urbanization level and parental occupation) or comorbidities. The risk of asthma was higher in 1-3, 4-6, 7-9 and 10-12 months (all P < .001), particularly in those with a higher frequency of admission (>5 per year). CONCLUSION: The incidence of asthma was higher in the EV cohort than in the non-EV cohort, comprising children aged ≤5 years, regardless of sex, urbanization level, parental occupation or season. In particular, the risk of asthma was higher in children with a higher frequency of admission, even in the absence of atopy or other respiratory infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: