We present an evaluation of transport of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) in the two‐way nested chemistry‐transport model “Tracer Model 5” (TM5). Modeled SF 6 values for January 2000 to November 2003 are compared with NOAA CMDL observations. This includes new high‐frequency SF 6 observations, frequent vertical profiles, and weekly flask data from more than 60 sites around the globe. This constitutes the most extensive set of SF 6 observations used in transport model evaluation to date. We find that TM5 captures temporal variability on all timescales well, including the relatively large SF 6 signals on synoptic scales (2–5 days). The model overestimates the meridional gradient of SF 6 by 19%, similar to previously used transport models. Vertical profiles are reproduced to within the standard error of the observations, and do not reveal large biases. An important area for future improvements is the mixing of the planetary boundary layer which is currently too slow, leading to modeled SF 6 mixing ratios that are too large over the continents. Increasing the horizontal resolution over North America from 6×4°, to 3×2°, to even 1×1° (lon×lat) does not affect the simulated global scale SF 6 distribution and potentially minimizes representation errors for continental sites. These results are highly relevant for future CO 2 flux estimates with TM5, which will be briefly discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peters et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: