Samples of 22 soils of the State of São Paulo, Brazil were collected from the 0–20 cm layer, dried, sieved, and analyzed for sulfur (S) utilizing the following extracting solutions: (a) calcium phosphate [Ca(H2PO4)2], 500 mg P L‐1 in 2.0 mol acetic acid (HOAc) L‐1, (b) 1 mol ammonium chloide (NH4C1) L‐1, (c) 0.5 mol ammonium acetate (NH4OAC) L‐1 in 0.25 mol HOAc L‐1, (d) ion exchange resin ‐ Resin 1 ‐ (2.5 cm3 of soil + 2.5 cm3 of resin in water and further extraction with 50 mL 0.8 mol NH4Cl L‐1 in 0.2 mol hydrochloric acid (HCl) L‐1), (e) ion exchange resin ‐ Resin 2 ‐ (5.0 cm3 of soil + 5.0 cm3 of resin and 25 mL 0.8 mol NH4Cl L‐1 in 0.2 mol HCl L‐1), (f) ion exchange resin ‐ Resin 3 ‐ (5.0 cm3 of soil + 2.5 cm3 resin and 25 mL 0.8 mol NH4Cl L‐1 in 0.2 mol HCl L‐1). Amounts of 2 kg of each soil, in four replicates were limed in order to reach a base saturation of 70% of the cation exchange capacity (CEC). After a period of incubation of 30 days all nutrients, except S, were added to the soil and corn seeds were planted. Plant tops were removed after 70 days, dried at 50°C, weighed, and analyzed for S determination. The correlation between the bioavailable S in the soil and the yield of dry matter or S uptake was best represented by the linear or the √X models. The coefficient of determination varied from 0.56 (Resin 1) to 0.82 (NH4OAc). Resins 2 and 3 methods showed good efficiency (R2 from 0.63 to 0.79), and can be utilized in the evaluation of S bioavailability in soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prochnow et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: