Sputum induction is a noninvasive method to evaluate airway inflammation. We investigated whether it can be safely and successfully performed in patients with severe, difficult-to-control asthma, and whether the patients at risk can be identified. Ninety-three severe asthmatics were included, all symptomatic despite inhaled corticosteroids (> or = 1,600 microg/d) and long-acting beta(2)-agonists > 1 yr. Patients with a postbronchodilator FEV(1) < 1 L and < 50% predicted were excluded from participation. Sputum induction was performed according to a strict protocol, using 0.9%, 3.0%, and 4.5% NaCl inhalation. In 74% (CI: 64 to 83%) of patients an adequate sputum sample could be obtained. Twenty-two percent (CI: 14 to 33%) developed excessive bronchoconstriction (decrease in FEV(1) > 15% from baseline) despite the continuing use of long-acting bronchodilators and pretreatment with 400 microg salbutamol. The decrease in FEV(1) was associated with increased use of rescue short-acting beta(2)-agonists in the previous 2 d (r(s) = 0.51, p = 0.002), lower postbronchodilator FEV(1) (r(s) = -0.31, p = 0.004), and lower provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% reduction in FEV(1) (PC(20)) (r(s) = -0.52, p < 0.001). Recent use of short-acting beta(2)-agonist increased the risk for excessive bronchoconstriction 10.2-fold (CI: 1.2 to 109.8). In conclusion, sputum induction can be safely and successfully performed in patients with severe, difficult-to-control asthma if a standardized protocol is used. However, severe bronchoconstriction may occur despite regular use of long-acting beta(2)-agonist and pretreatment with salbutamol 400 microg. In particular, patients who have used additional short-acting beta(2)-agonists as rescue medication during the days preceding the induction, are at high risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brinke et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: