Key result
PRECEDE-PROCEED educational intervention significantly improves nutritional habits and behavioral factors versus control at 1 month.
RCT (n=164)
Randomly divided
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study sought to assess the effect of precede-proceed model on preventive behaviors for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in high-risk individuals. In this semi-experimental study, 164 high-risk individuals for type 2 DM were selected and were randomly divided into two groups of intervention and control ( n = 85). Educational intervention was performed as a single session face-to-face instruction for 1.5 hr for the intervention group participants. Data were collected before (baseline) and immediately and 1 month after the intervention in the two groups. The mean score of predisposing (knowledge) factors ( p = .001), reinforcing factors ( p = .001), and enabling factors ( p = .02) were significantly different at baseline and 1 month after the intervention in the intervention group compared with the control group ( p < .05). A significant improvement occurred in the nutritional habits of high-risk participants in the intervention group at 1 month after the intervention compared with controls ( p = .001). The precede-proceed model can be effective for promoting the preventive behaviors for type 2 DM in high-risk individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moshki et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in High risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=164). Precede-proceed model educational intervention vs. Control group was evaluated on Mean score of predisposing (knowledge), reinforcing, and enabling factors (p=p = .001). A precede-proceed model educational intervention significantly improved nutritional habits (p=0.001) and predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors compared to control at 1 month.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: