Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents two methods for computing differential propagation phase shift (ϕ DP ) using time series data form a coherent radar with alternate switching between two linear but orthogonal polarizations. An analysis of the statistical error in ϕ DP estimate shows that ϕ DP can be estimated with less than 0.5° standard error using time and range averaging. To evaluate the usefulness of ϕ DP for estimating rainfall rate (R) vis‐a‐vis the Z DR method, a discussion on the sensitivity of R to standard errors in ϕ DP as well as Z H and Z DR is presented. It is shown that the relation, differential propagation phase constant Δϕ versus R , is relatively insensitive to drop size distribution (DSD) variations and thus can yield more accurate R estimate, even when a direct relationship between Δϕ and R is assumed. However, standard error in Δϕ estimate causes large inaccuracies of R at low values ( R < 50 mmh −1 ), thus limiting its usefulness to higher rainfall rates. It is also shown that Δϕ can be used as a third remote measurable in conjunction with Z H and Z DR to determine a three parameter gamma DSD. Another use of Δϕ is likely to be in hydrometeor type identification, especially hail in severe storms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sachidananda et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: