This work, by means of molecular dynamics simulations, shows that the features of C 60 encapsulation into boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) are similar to the features of that into carbon nanotubes (CNTs), whereas the encapsulating and the internal dynamics of the C 60 @BNNT are different from those of the C 60 @CNT. Since the C 60 encapsulation into the BNNTs is energetically more stable than that into the CNTs and the suction force on the C 60 molecule induced by the BNNTs is higher than that by the CNTs, the C 60 encapsulation into the BNNT is achieved faster than that into the CNT. The internal dynamics of the C 60 molecule inside the BNNT is also different from that inside the CNT, because the C 60 @CNT system includes only one long range interaction of C–C whereas the C 60 @BNNT system includes both C–B and C–N long range interactions. Because of the difference of the binding energies and the equilibrium distances between C–B and C–N, the C 60 molecule frequently collided against the BNNT wall in molecular dynamics simulations. At low temperature, the energy dissipation of the C 60 @CNT system mainly occurred at both end edges of the CNT, where the C 60 molecule is under restoring (or sucking-in) forces. Energy dissipation of the C 60 @BNNT resulted from collisions against the BNNT wall as well as at both end edges of the BNNT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: