We have developed a physical theory for the finding that the most intense laboratory vortex occurs when it is in the form of an end-wall vortex. We argue that the end-wall vortex allows no standing centrifugal waves (i.e., it is supercritical), and therefore, disturbances cannot propagate down from aloft. This allows the low central pressure of the end-wall vortex at the level of maximum azimuthal velocity to be balanced by a central axial jet which jet which accelerates from the lower end wall to this level. This supercritical, end-wall vortex undergoes a transition to a subcritical vortex aloft through a vortex breakdown. We construct a model for the maximum intensity of these vortices by developing a model for the end-wall vortex and by finding the criterion for a vortex breakdown to be in steady suspension above the lower end wall. The model agrees well with previous experimental simulations of tornado-like vortices in the Purdue tornado vortex chamber a steady end-wall vortex adjacent to the lower boundary can have a maximum azimuthal velocity approximately 1.7× the maximum azimuthal velocity in the subcritical vortex aloft. We believe the model offers a way to reconcile the maximum observed tornado windspeeds with hydrostatic (subcritical) tornado models, which, by themselves, are inadequate to explain the highest windspeeds associated with tornadoes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiedler et al. (1986) studied this question.