Why the study?
Does steady fluid flow enhance cell migration and construct cellularity in SPIO-labeled engineered heart valve tissues compared to static culture?
Does steady fluid flow enhance cell migration and construct cellularity in SPIO-labeled engineered heart valve tissues compared to static culture?
Steady fluid flow enhances cell migration and improves cellularity and collagen content in engineered heart valve tissues, which can be effectively monitored using SPIO labeling and MRI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Steady flow may improve engineered valve construct quality in vitro; leaves open translation and SPIO-MRI monitoring to clinical use.
In heart valve tissue engineering, assessment of cell migration under dynamic states can provide insights on the evolving tissue structure. We labeled human vascular smooth muscle (SMCs), endothelial (ECs), and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) microparticles and visualized them using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under steady flow. We determined that vascular cells were able to remain reasonably viable and proliferate well after being labeled with SPIO microparticles (200 μg/mL) for 48 hours. SPIO-labeled cells were successfully visualized using T2* contrast. When physiologically representative shear stresses (5-6 dynes/cm2) were applied to SMC-EC coculture-seeded scaffolds, hypointense regions seemed to have decreased after 2 weeks in some locations, whereas others revealed sustained levels of T2* contrast; similar observations were seen in the case of BMSC-seeded scaffolds. This could be attributable to increased out-of-plane cell migratory activity, which occurred from the fluid-induced mechanical cues received, which was not previously evidenced in static culture. Vascular cells and BMSCs were labeled with remarkably high concentrations of SPIO. Moreover, steady fluid flow enhanced intrascaffold cell migration of vascular SMCs and ECs as well as BMSCs, which, in turn, significantly improved construct cellularity and extracellular collagen content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martinez et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: