Why the study?
The transition from NAFLD to MASLD marks a paradigm shift in hepatology, prompting a need to critically examine its conceptual evolution and implications for pathogenesis, diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical management.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Adoption of MASLD nomenclature may enhance metabolic risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation in cardiovascular cohorts.
The transition from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) reflects a paradigm shift in hepatology and highlights the need for a more pathophysiologically based classification. The aim of this review is to critically examine the conceptual evolution from NAFLD to MASLD, highlighting the implications for pathogenesis, diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic strategies within the broader context of systemic metabolic dysfunction. Unlike the exclusion-based NAFLD definition, MASLD is grounded in positive diagnostic criteria and recognizes hepatic steatosis as a manifestation of metabolic disease. This reclassification improves clinical risk assessment and aligns hepatic care with cardiometabolic management. MASLD is closely linked to insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, chronic inflammation, and gut dysbiosis, which contribute to cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Non-invasive tools (e.g., FIB-4, elastography, ELF score) and emerging biomarkers (e.g., miR-122, CK-18, FGF21) support early diagnosis and personalized approaches. Therapeutically, MASLD management includes lifestyle modification, antidiabetic agents (GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors), PPAR agonists, and novel drugs such as resmetirom. This evolving framework demands integrated, multidisciplinary strategies to address the systemic burden and clinical heterogeneity of MASLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acierno et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: