Leadership is increasingly being recognised as a key factor in supporting performance across a range of domains. Over the past two decades, a body of research has emerged with a focus on examining different safety leadership styles, with general support established for a positive influence on a range of performance and outcome variables. Despite this, findings to date can be considered limited, with the concepts and methodologies applied limiting advancement in understanding. This article aims to review the literature targeting the influence of safety leadership on performance and outcomes in high-risk industries to determine the extent to which systems-thinking is evident. The review identifies a number of limitations relating to current methodological and conceptual approaches used, highlighting considerable gaps in understanding within the current knowledge base. In conclusion, the application of systems-thinking is proposed to support both methodological and conceptual advancement of the study of safety leadership in high-risk industries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donovan et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: