In 240 days of X-ray monitoring of M82, we have discovered an X-ray periodicity at 62.0 ± 2.5 days with a peak-to-peak amplitude corresponding to an isotropic luminosity of 2.4 × 10 40 ergs s -1 in M82 and an X-ray flare reaching a peak luminosity of 9.8 × 10 40 ergs s -1 . The periodicity and flare likely originate from the ultraluminous X-ray source (ULX) in M82, which has been identified as a possible intermediate-mass black hole. We suggest that the 62 day modulation is due to orbital motion within an X-ray binary with a Roche lobe overflowing companion star, which would imply that the average density of the companion star is near 5 × 10 -5 g cm -3 and is therefore a giant or supergiant. Chandra observations just after the flare show an energy spectrum that is consistent with a power law with no evidence of a thermal component or line emission. Radio observations made with the VLA during the flare allow us to rule out a blazar identification for the source and place strong constraints on relativistically beamed models of the X-ray emission. The Chandra observations reveal that a second X-ray source reached a flux of 4.4 × 10 -12 ergs cm -2 s -1 in the 0.3-7 keV band, which is dramatically higher than any flux previously seen from this source and corresponds to an isotropic luminosity of 1.1 × 10 40 ergs s -1 . This source is a second ultraluminous X-ray source in M82 and may give rise to the QPOs detected from the central region of M82.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaaret et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: