Advancement in oxygenator membrane technology has further expanded the boundaries in the clinical application of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO 2 R). Despite the advent of modern poly-4-methyl-1-pentene (PMP) membranes, limited information exists on the performance of these membranes at low sweep gas and blood flows. Moreover, physiological relationships for CO 2 removal at these flows are less explored. Hence, CO 2 removal was quantified in an in vitro setting using a PMP membrane oxygenator. ECCO 2 R was performed using a .8 m 2 surface pediatric oxygenator in an in vitro setting with freshly drawn single-source porcine blood. In this setting, low blood flows of either 200 or 350 mL/min were generated, with sweep gas flow rates of 100, 200, and 400 mL/min, respectively. CO 2 transfer ranged from 14.05 ± 4.35 mL/min/m 2 to 18.76 ± 4.26 mL/min/m 2 at a sweep gas to a blood flow ratio of .5:1 to 2:1 ( p < .01). Decreasing this ratio i.e., increasing the blood flow (.5:1.75 and 2:1.75) resulted in a lower CO 2 transfer of 10.00 ± 4.77 mL/min/m 2 to 16.87 ± 5.09 mL/min/m 2 , which was still statistically significant ( p < .01). Alternatively, decreasing the sweep gas to blood flow ratio, while maintaining a constant gas flow, did not show a significant increase in CO 2 extraction ( p > .05). At these test parameters, an increase in sweep gas improved the CO 2 transfer, whereas an increase in blood flow resulted in a lower CO 2 transfer. These results indicate that CO 2 removal in low-flow ECCO 2 R is mainly sweep gas flow driven. Although these settings might not be applicable for clinical use, this study gives tangible information about the important factor involved in ECCO 2 R.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hugo et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: