This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Foot deformities, particularly hallux valgus, significantly impact patients’ quality of life. Conventional radiographs are essential for their assessment, but manual measurements are time-consuming and variable. This study assessed the reliability of a deep learning-based solution (Milvue, France) that automates podiatry angle measurements from radiographs compared to manual measurements made by radiologists. Methods: A retrospective, non-interventional study at Perpignan Hospital analyzed the weight-bearing foot radiographs of 105 adult patients (August 2017–August 2022). The deep learning (DL) model’s measurements were compared to those of two radiologists for various angles (M1-P1, M1-M2, M1-M5, and P1-P2 for Djian–Annonier, calcaneal slope, first metatarsal slope, and Meary–Tomeno angles). Statistical analyses evaluated DL performance and inter-observer variability. Results: Of the 105 patients included (29 men and 76 women; mean age 55), the DL solution showed excellent consistency with manual measurements, except for the P1-P2 angle. The mean absolute error (MAE) for the frontal view was lowest for M1-M2 (0.96°) and highest for P1-P2 (3.16°). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated excellent agreement for M1-P1, M1-M2, and M1-M5. For the lateral view, the MAE was 0.92° for calcaneal pitch and 2.83° for Meary–Tomeno, with ICCs ≥ 0.93. For hallux valgus detection, accuracy was 94%, sensitivity was 91.1%, and specificity was 97.2%. Manual measurements averaged 203 s per patient, while DL processing was nearly instantaneous. Conclusions: The DL solution reliably automates foot alignment assessments, significantly reducing time without compromising accuracy. It may improve clinical efficiency and consistency in podiatric evaluations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanzilli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: