Cellobiohydrolases break down cellulose sequentially by sliding along the crystal surface with a single cellulose strand threaded through the catalytic tunnel of the enzyme. This so-called processive mechanism relies on a complex pattern of enzyme-substrate interactions, which need to be addressed in molecular descriptions of processivity and its driving forces. Here, we have used titration calorimetry to study interactions of cellooligosaccharides (COS) and a catalytically deficient variant (E212Q) of the enzyme Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei . This enzyme has ∼10 glucopyranose subsites in the catalytic tunnel, and using COS ligands with a degree of polymerization (DP) from 2 to 8, different regions of the tunnel could be probed. For COS ligands with a DP of 2–3 the binding constants were around 10 5 m −1 , and for longer ligands (DP 5–8) this value was ∼10 7 m −1 . Within each of these groups we did not find increased affinity as the ligands got longer and potentially filled more subsites. On the contrary, we found a small but consistent affinity loss as DP rose from 6 to 8, particularly at the higher investigated temperatures. Other thermodynamic functions (Δ H , Δ S , and Δ C p ) decreased monotonously with both temperature and DP. Combined interpretation of these thermodynamic results and previously published structural data allowed assessment of an affinity profile along the length axis of the active tunnel.Substrate interactions in the long tunnel of processive cellulases govern both their catalytic activity and stepwise movement along a cellulose strand. Results The energetics of enzyme-substrate interactions at different depths of the tunnel are reported. Conclusion The affinity for the substrate varies strongly through the tunnel. Significance Quantitative information on interactions is required to understand the complex processive mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colussi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: