Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Open science hit the mainstream of discourse in the scientific community in 2016. Here I examine the emerging criticisms leveled against how we publish and disseminate science and argues it may be time to reframe the open science project. Rather than relying on instrumentalist language of “carrot-and-sticks” and “rewards-and-incentives” we should, instead, focus on the actual working conditions for scientists and the political economy in which they are embedded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alex K. Lancaster (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: