Why the study?
Patients with AF frequently have competing ischaemic stroke mechanisms including carotid atherosclerosis, but the associations between OACs plus APA and outcomes after stroke in this population remain unclear.
Does the addition of antiplatelet agents to oral anticoagulants affect outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and carotid artery disease after ischaemic stroke?
Does the addition of antiplatelet agents to oral anticoagulants affect outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and carotid artery disease after ischaemic stroke?
In patients with AF and carotid artery disease after ischaemic stroke, using NOACs without antiplatelet agents is associated with lower major bleeding risk without increasing recurrent stroke or mortality compared to combination therapy.
NOAC monotherapy may lower major bleeding risk without raising recurrent stroke in this population; randomized trials needed before changing practice.
INTRODUCTION: People with atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently have competing mechanisms for ischaemic stroke, including extracranial carotid atherosclerosis. The objective of this study was to determine associations between use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) plus antiplatelet agents (APA) after ischaemic stroke and outcomes for patients with AF and carotid artery disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Participants receiving OACs with or without APA were propensity score-matched for age, sex, ethnicity, co-morbidities and presence of cardiac and vascular implants and grafts. Outcomes were 1-year mortality, recurrent stroke and major bleeding. RESULTS: Of 5708 patients, 24.1% (n=1628) received non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs) with no APA, 26.0% (n=1401) received NOACs plus APA, 20.7% (n=1243) received warfarin without APA and 29.2% (n=1436) received warfarin plus APA. There was no significant difference in risk of recurrent stroke between the groups. Compared to receiving NOACs without APA, receiving warfarin plus APA was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20, 1.89)) and major bleeding (HR 1.66 (95% CI 1.40, 1.96)). Receiving NOACs plus APA was also associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared to NOACs without APA (HR 1.27 (95% CI 1.07, 1.51), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest for patients with AF and carotid artery disease after ischaemic stroke, receiving NOACs without APA is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding with no negative impact on recurrent stroke or mortality. Evidence from randomised trials is needed to confirm this finding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harrison et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: