Key result
CMR definitively diagnoses cor triatriatum after echo and CT misidentify a left atrial mass.
Case Report (n=1)
CMR is critical in differentiating cor triatriatum from a cardiac mass when initial TTE and CTA findings are ambiguous.
CMR may resolve ambiguous TTE/CTA findings in suspected atrial masses; leaves open prospective validation for cor triatriatum diagnosis.
A 32-year-old woman presented with a 2-year history of intermittent chest tightness and haemoptysis. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE, Panel H) revealed a hypoechoic mass near the right pulmonary vein orifices with no detectable flow. Computed tomography angiography (CTA, Panels E–G, white arrows) showed a low-density lesion in the left atrium, absence of contrast opacification in the right pulmonary veins, and numerous perivenous collateral vessels (see Supplementary data online, Video S1). The initial diagnosis was a left atrial mass affecting the right pulmonary veins. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) definitively diagnosed cor triatriatum. The cine sequence demonstrated left atrium divided by a linear low-signal membrane into an accessory chamber (AC) and true atrium (TA). All right pulmonary veins drained into the AC, demonstrating disordered flow, while left veins drained into the TA (Panel A, white arrow; Supplementary data online, Video S2). On perfusion imaging, the AC and right pulmonary veins showed no early filling (Panel B, white arrow) but slow contrast wash-in, with signal intensity eventually matching the TA on both late perfusion and delayed enhancement (Panels C–D, white arrow; Supplementary data online, Videos S3 and S4).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LI et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Cor triatriatum (n=1). Cardiac magnetic resonance was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance definitively diagnosed cor triatriatum in a patient initially misdiagnosed with a left atrial mass by echocardiography and computed tomography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: