Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I analyze the extent to which classical phase transitions, both first order and continuous, pose a challenge for intertheoretic reduction. My contention is that phase transitions are compatible with a notion of reduction that combines Nagelian reduction and what Thomas Nickles called Reduction 2 . I also argue that, even if the same approach to reduction applies to both types of phase transitions, there is a crucial difference in their physical treatment: in addition to the thermodynamic limit, in continuous phase transitions there is a second infinite limit involved, which marks an important difference in the reduction of first-order and continuous phase transitions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patricia Palacios (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: