The ENDOR response of 57 Fe nuclei and protons of the high-potential iron−sulfur (HiPIP) protein iso-II from Ectothiorhodospira halophila in frozen solutions, i.e., on nonoriented systems, has been exploited to determine electronic and structural details of the oxidized [Fe 4 S 4 ] 3+ cluster and its protein environment. Two distinct 57 Fe hyperfine couplings were resolved and assigned to pairs of highly symmetric ferric and mixed-valence iron ions in agreement with results of Mössbauer and ENDOR studies on related proteins and model compounds. From the analysis of dipolar contributions of the eight cysteine β-CH 2 − and five additional protons of residues close to the cluster, the spin population on the iron ions in the ferric and the mixed-valence pair was deduced. The symmetric spin vector coupling model yields coefficients, which suggest the existence of a | 7 / 2,3, 1 / 2 〉 state or an admixture of | 9 / 2,4, 1 / 2 〉 and | 7 / 2,4, 1 / 2 〉 as possible ground states of the cluster. The identification of the mixed-valence and ferric irons within the cluster was in agreement with NMR results based on the sequence specific assignments of proton couplings. In addition, a unique orientation of the g -tensor with respect to the molecular frame was found in the protein, the maximal g -tensor component being nearly perpendicular to the cluster face containing the mixed-valence irons. The intermediate and minimal components were related to the vectors connecting the ferric and mixed-valence irons, respectively. The analysis of the isotropic parts of the cysteine β-CH 2 -proton interactions allowed establishment of a correlation with the NMR shifts of corresponding protons, obtained by applying different scaling factors for protons close to the ferric and mixed-valence pair, respectively. The empirical law used to describe the relationship between the geometric orientation of a CH bond and the observed isotropic interaction for these types of clusters could be verified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kappl et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: