Faced with the twin challenges of anthropogenic climate change and ‘peak oil’, the need for an urgent and radical transformation of transport energy has been widely recognised. Adopting a neo-Polanyian economic sociology approach, this article asks what conditions European governance capacity to respond to these challenges, at either national or regional levels, using biofuels as a case study. It asks if the complexity of its political institutions, and the heterogeneity of interests and economic organisations, present ‘the biggest obstacle of all’ (Cohen 2007 Cohen, B. J. 2007. Enlargement and the International Role of the Euro. Review of International Political Economy, 14: 746–73. (doi:10.1080/09692290701642630)[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) to reduce fossil fuel dependency. By examining the European Commission level and comparing five countries, evidence is produced for a political failure in terms of continued fossil fuel dependency. Incumbent interests in the agricultural sector and a distinctively European legacy of a transport fleet dependent on fossil diesel, have led to a marriage of convenience between rapeseed farmers and vehicle manufacturers. As a consequence, rather than escaping from the path dependency on fossil fuels (Unruh 2000 Unruh, G. C. 2000. Understanding Carbon Lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12): 817–30. (doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7)[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Europe has gone down a cul-de-sac of rapeseed biodiesel inherently limited in scope, and with the low levels of greenhouse gas emissions savings. Ironically this outcome is in part an unintended consequence of opposition to biofuels from environmentalist groups and politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harvey et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: