I explore the possibility that the cosmos is fundamentally an equilibrium system and review the attractive features of such theories. Equilibrium cosmologies are commonly thought to fail due to the ``Boltzmann brain'' problem. I show that it is possible to evade the Boltzmann brain problem if there is a suitable coarse-grained relationship between the fundamental degrees of freedom and the cosmological observables. I make my main points with simple toy models and then review the de Sitter equilibrium model as an illustration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreas Albrecht (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: