CONTEXT: The ongoing need to attract more physicians into rural practice is well documented, and medical school admission practices are a critical component of a multistep effort to produce rural practitioners. PURPOSE: This study was completed to evaluate whether the practice of adjusting for the selectivity of the undergraduate school attended by medical school applicants has a detrimental effect on the pre-interview rankings of rural applicants. METHODS: Applicants to the Medical University of South Carolina from 1996 through 1999 were the subjects. Applicant pre-interview scores were calculated with and without the adjustment to grade point average (GPA) for selectivity. FINDINGS: There were 2033 in-state applicants in 1996 through 1999, and 8.5% to 9.7% were from rural areas. The selectivity adjustment resulted in 1 less rural applicant gaining an admission interview in 2 cohorts, 1 additional rural applicant gaining an admission interview in 1 cohort, and no difference in the other cohort. CONCLUSION: Adjusting undergraduate GPAs of medical school applicants based on undergraduate selectivity did not adversely affect the number of rural applicants offered admission interviews.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilbert et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: