Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pulmonary infarction should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a solitary pulmonary nodule, even in patients with a known history of malignancy.
Pulmonary infarction may present as a solitary pulmonary nodule resembling a malignant pulmonary tumor. A 71-year-old woman who had undergone the surgery for abdominal malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) with inflammatory nature presented with a small nodule in the right lung in computed tomographic images. Two months later, the nodule became enlarged and had an accompanying infiltrative shadow. We suspected a metastatic tumor from MFH and performed video-assisted thoracic surgery. However, subsequent pathological diagnosis of the nodule was pulmonary infarction due to thromboembolism. When a peripheral nodule is detected, pulmonary infarction should be considered as a possible diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teramoto et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: