If $\,f$ is holomorphic on a domain D in the complex plane, an analogous function F of several complex variables is constructed by taking a weighted average of $\,f$ over the convex hull of \ z₁ ,z₂ , ⋯ ,zₖ \. Although F is defined at first only if the convex hull is contained in D, it is shown later that F can be continued analytically along any rectifiable arc in Dᵏ, provided that singular points with zᵢ = zⱼ (for some distinct i, j) are excluded if D is multiply connected. Taylor and Laurent series for f have single-series analogues for F, and the analogue of Cauchy’s integral formula is a representation of F by an integral around a contour in D encircling z₁ ,z₂ , ⋯ ,zₖ. The hypergeometric function ₂ F₁ (a,b;c;x) is an average of z- a over the line segment joining $1-x$ and 1, the confluent hypergeometric function ₁ F₁ (b;c;x) is an average of eᶻ over the line segment joining x and 0, and elliptic integrals are averages of a half-odd-integral power of z over a triangle (or a quadrilateral for integrals of the third kind). The average of z- a in the case of k complex variables is the hypergeometric R-function, which appears in both the series and contour-integral representations of F. The parameters b and c in the ₂ F₁ and ₁ F₁ functions come from the weight function used in the averaging process. Even in the case of k variables the weight function is taken to have a rather special form, with the result that F always satisfies a system of Euler–Poisson partial differential equations. Connections with axially symmetric potential theory, fractional integration, and integral transforms are mentioned briefly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. C. Carlson (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: