BACKGROUND: 2-[18F]fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may assist the diagnosis of dementia but it is an expensive investigation. OBJECTIVE: To obtain management impact data for FDG-PET in dementia. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 194 consecutive patients referred from a memory clinic for FDG-PET at the discretion of the dementia specialists. Diagnosis and management plans formulated at a multidisciplinary patient review meeting were compared before and after the release of PET findings. RESULTS: FDG-PET had moderate to high impact on the diagnosis and management in 85 (44%) participants. Diagnosis changed from probable neurodegenerative disease in 27 patients to a non-degenerative diagnosis and vice versa in 12 patients. PET changed the type of dementia in another 29 (15%) participants and prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors in 33 patients (17%). Number of uncertain diagnoses reduced from 58 to 35 (p < 0.001, χ2 = 15.12), differential diagnoses reduced from 127 to 55 (p = 0.003) and very probable diagnoses increased from 5 to 42 (p ≤ 0.001, χ2 = 1.01). Mini-Mental State Examination score was higher in those where PET had high diagnostic impact (26.3 ± 3.1 versus 23.9 ± 5.1, p ≤ 0.05). The degree of impact correlated with the pre-scan level of diagnostic uncertainty (ρ = -0.258, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The management impact was higher in those with greater diagnostic uncertainty and in those with less severe cognitive impairment. The findings suggest that FDG-PET is a useful adjunct for the management of suspected dementing disorders in appropriately selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elias et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: