Why the study?
Does composite 3D echocardiographic reconstruction accurately estimate left ventricular volumes compared to angiography in children?
Does composite 3D echocardiographic reconstruction accurately estimate left ventricular volumes compared to angiography in children?
3D echocardiographic reconstruction is feasible in children and may offer improved global LV geometry representation compared to traditional methods, despite systematically underestimating volumes compared to angiography.
Echocardiographic LV volume underestimation warrants caution versus angiography in children; leaves open whether 3D reconstruction reduces bias.
A composite three-dimensional (3D) echographic left ventricular (LV) reconstruction to measure LV volumes was evaluated in 26 children. Four apical views, to minimize assumptions about LV shape, were used to obtain a "wire-cage" model of the LV in 3D. Numerical integration was used to make estimates of both end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. Volume estimates obtained with echographic techniques and those obtained with the angiographic biplane method were compared. The echographic volume estimates were systematically smaller (p less than 0.005), and a consistent trend, though not significant, was observed indicating that this systematic error is less for the 3D method. One-way analysis of variance confirmed significant global geometric fluctuations. Hence, 3D reconstruction can be performed in a clinical setting, and the enhanced graphic representation of global LV geometry may contribute to improved patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazzalari et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: