Why the study?
Does hospital reliance on Medicaid reimbursement increase the probability of adverse medical events in pediatric discharges?
Does hospital reliance on Medicaid reimbursement increase the probability of adverse medical events in pediatric discharges?
Hospital reliance on comparatively low Medicaid reimbursement is associated with an increased risk of adverse medical events for hospitalized children.
Medicaid-reliant hospitals may warrant safety audits in pediatrics; leaves open whether reimbursement drives adverse events or reflects unmeasured factors.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between Medicaid-induced financial stress of a hospital and the probability of an adverse medical event for a pediatric discharge. DATA SOURCES: Secondary data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey of Hospitals. Study examines 985,896 pediatric discharges (children age 0-17), from 1,050 community hospitals in 26 states (representing 63 percent of the U.S. Medicaid population) between 2005 and 2007. STUDY DESIGN: We estimate the probability of an adverse event, controlling for patient, hospital, and state characteristics, using an aggregated, composite measure to overcome rarity of individual events. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Children in hospitals with relatively high proportions of pediatric discharges that are more reliant on Medicaid reimbursement are more likely than children in other hospitals (odds ratio = 1.62) to experience an adverse event. Medicaid pediatric inpatients are more likely than privately insured patients (odds ratio = 1.10) to experience an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital reliance on comparatively low Medicaid reimbursement may contribute to the problem of adverse medical events for hospitalized children. Policies to reduce adverse events should account for differences in underlying, contributing factors of these events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: