Why the study?
This study aimed to assess cardiac rehabilitation barriers, formal exercise supervision use, and readmissions in patients with heart failure for the first time.
Does professional exercise supervision reduce readmissions in patients with heart failure?
Does professional exercise supervision reduce readmissions in patients with heart failure?
Professional exercise supervision is associated with significantly lower 30-day readmission rates in heart failure patients, highlighting the need for systematic cardiac rehabilitation referral.
Screening HF inpatients for CR barriers may guide referrals; leaves open links to readmissions and supervised exercise uptake.
Background: This study assessed cardiac rehabilitation (CR) barriers in heart failure (HF) patients for the first time, use of formal exercise supervision, and readmissions. Methods: This was a prospective study of HF in-patients at a private hospital. The CR Barriers Scale (CRBS), and International Physical Activity Questionnaire were administered. Participants were called 30 and 90-days to ascertain formal exercise supervision and readmissions. Results: Of 95 participants, 85 (89.5%) were retained at the 30-day call, and 86 (90.5%) at 90; 2 died. The mean total CRBS score was 2.3±.6.5, with highest item scores for lack of energy, already exercising, lack of awareness, distance and exercise pain/fatigue. Only 1 participant enrolled in CR, but close to half had engaged an exercise professional (n=48, 56.5% and n=45, 52.3%) at both follow-ups. 25.8% of patients were readmitted at 30 days and 25.5% at 90 days. Participants who had professional exercise supervision within 30 days had significantly fewer readmissions (n=7, 14.6%) compared with patients who did not (n=13, 35.1%; p=0.03). Conclusions: CR barriers are high in HF patients. Despite some accessing professional exercise training, most were insufficiently active. Systematic CR referral and coverage advocacy could mitigate this poor self-management, and ultimately the high readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: