Why the study?
This study aimed to evaluate the prenatal rate of congenital heart defects and the frequency of termination of pregnancy due to congenital heart defect, depending on the severity of the defect and concomitant diseases of the fetus.
The decision to terminate a pregnancy following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease is strongly influenced by the severity of the defect and the presence of associated genetic or morphological anomalies.
Parental TOP decisions for fetal CHD increase with severity and anomalies; leaves open optimal counseling in liberal termination settings.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prenatal rate of congenital heart defects (CHDs) and the frequency of termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to a CHD, depending on the severity of the defect and concomitant diseases of the fetus.Methods: The data were assessed retrospectively between 2002 and 2017. Ultrasound examination was performed mostly in the second trimester. For analysis, the CHDs were divided into three groups of severity and three groups of fetus impairment.Results: A total of 40,885 fetuses underwent echocardiography. The CHDs were detected in 1.0% (398/40,885) and were an isolated anomaly in 69% (275/398). Forty-nine percent (197/398) of families decided to TOP. In all groups of severity, the rate of TOP rose linearly when comparing isolated defects and cases with associated morphological and genetic impairments. The TOP was significantly dependent on the associated anomalies in patients with the most correctable defects (p < .001) and the severity of CHDs in isolated cases without any other impairment (p < .001).Conclusion: The parents’ decision to terminate increased with the severity of the defect and the associated anomalies of the fetus. The parents were mostly influenced by the associated anomalies when the CHD was correctable, and genetic factors played a more important role than morphological ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavlíček et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: