Key result
BMI tracks cardiovascular and diabetes risk markers as effectively as skinfold thickness and DXA.
Cross-Sectional
Effect estimate: R = 0.20-0.46
p-value: p=<0.01
BACKGROUND: Choice of adiposity measure may be important in the evaluation of relationships between adiposity and risk markers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. AIM: We explored the strengths of risk marker associations with BMI, a simple measure of adiposity, and with measures provided by skinfold thicknesses and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We evaluated in three subgroups of white males (n = 156-349), participating in a health screening program, the strengths of relationship between measures of total and regional adiposity and risk markers relating to blood pressure, lipids and lipoproteins, insulin sensitivity, and subclinical inflammation. RESULTS: Independent of age, smoking, alcohol intake, and exercise, the strongest correlations with adiposity measures were seen with serum triglyceride concentrations and indices of insulin sensitivity, with strengths of association showing little difference between BMI and skinfold and DXA measures of total and percent body fat (R = 0.20-0.46, P < 0.01). Significant but weaker associations with adiposity were seen for serum HDL cholesterol and only relatively inconsistent associations with adiposity for total and LDL cholesterol and indices of subclinical inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: BMI can account for variation in risk markers in white males as well as more sophisticated measures derived from skinfold thickness measurements or DXA scanning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hariri et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk markers. Body Mass Index (BMI) vs. Skinfold thicknesses and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated on Correlation with serum triglyceride concentrations and indices of insulin sensitivity (R = 0.20-0.46, p=<0.01). BMI correlates with cardiovascular and diabetes risk markers in adult white males as effectively as skinfold thickness and DXA measurements (R = 0.20-0.46, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: