Why the study?
A rapid, selective, and reliable LC-MS/MS method was needed to obtain the pharmacokinetic profile of the novel α1/β1-blocker TJ0711 and its metabolites in plasma.
A validated LC-MS/MS method demonstrated that the novel α1/β1-blocker TJ0711 and its metabolites exhibit dose-proportional pharmacokinetics in beagle dogs.
Supports PK studies of novel perioperative antihypertensive and metabolites; leaves open clinical translation pending trials.
TJ0711∙HCl, which is a novel α1/β1 adrenoceptor blocking agent with a ratio of 1:1 for α1/β1, is designed to treat and prevent perioperative hypertension. M1 and M3 were identified as important metabolites in vitro for either antihypertension activity or the major metabolite production. In order to obtain a pharmacokinetic profile of both TJ0711 and its metabolites, a rapid, selective, and reliable LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of TJ0711 and two metabolites in beagle dog plasma via efficiently separating two interferential metabolites M16 and M4 from M1 and M3, respectively. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters CORTECS C18+ column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.7 μm). The mass spectrometric detection was carried out in positive ion MRM mode with ESI+ source. Protein precipitation was used in sample preparation and provided good recovery without a matrix effect. Good linearity was observed at the ranges of 0.5–100 ng/mL for TJ0711 and M3, 0.1–20 ng/mL for M1. Additional validation results were within the acceptance limits followed U.S. FDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. This method was successfully applied to an intravenous infusion pharmacokinetic study of TJ0711 at dosing rates of 3, 6, and 12 µg/kg/min in anesthetized beagle dogs for the first time. TJ0711 and its two metabolites exhibited effective proportionality in the dosage of 3 to 12 µg/kg/min. Neither TJ0711 nor its metabolites showed significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters such as t1/2, CL, and Vss among three dose groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: