Because the results of our published trial [R. Ramphal, B. S. Kramer, K. H. Rand, R. S. Weiner, and J. W. Shands, Jr., J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 12(Suppl. A):81-88, 1983] of ceftazidime versus cephalothin, gentamicin, and carbenicillin (KGC) revealed a preponderance of gram-positive superinfections, including those caused by clostridia, in patients treated with ceftazidime, we added vancomycin to the ceftazidime regimen at study entry 49 and continued with a 2:1 randomized comparison of ceftazidime-vancomycin (CV) versus KGC. Criteria for study entry were fever (temperature, greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C on one occasion or greater than or equal to 38 degrees C on two occasions 6 h apart) and granulocytopenia (less than 500/mm3 or a falling count anticipated to be less than 500/mm3). Ninety-five entries (79 patients) were evaluable. The numbers of initial clinical responses for ceftazidime-, KGC-, and CV-treated patients were 9 of 21 (43%), 21 of 37 (57%), and 21 of 37 (57%), respectively; differences were not significant. The death rate was lower with CV (2 of 37 patients) than with KGC (10 of 37 patients) (P less than 0.05 by two-tailed analysis) or with ceftazidime alone (7 of 21 patients) (P less than 0.025). Death from presumed infections occurred in 9 of 37 KGC-treated patients versus 1 of 37 CV-treated patients (P less than 0.025). Superinfections occurred in five ceftazidime-treated patients (24%) versus 7 KGC-treated patients (19%) but not in CV-treated patients (CV versus KGC, P less than 0.05; CV versus ceftazidime, P less than 0.01). CV appears to be superior to KGC or ceftazidime alone in the management of febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kramer et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: