Why the study?
Does outpatient preoperative evaluation reduce length of stay and hospital costs in patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Does outpatient preoperative evaluation reduce length of stay and hospital costs in patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Outpatient preoperative evaluation and same-day admission significantly reduce preoperative length of stay and hospital costs for vascular surgery patients without increasing mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support shorter preoperative stays and lower costs in vascular surgery; leaves open randomized confirmation of safety and generalizability.
UNLABELLED: Interventions that decrease perioperative length of stay can result in considerable cost-savings. This study assesses the impact of same-day admission using outpatient preoperative evaluation on the lengths of stay and hospital costs for patients who underwent carotid end-arterectomy (CEA) or lower extremity revascularization (LER). Patient characteristics and length of stay were compared for two 1-yr periods before and after outpatient preoperative evaluation had been implemented. There were no significant differences before and after the initiation of outpatient preoperative evaluation in the CEA and LER groups in mean age and ASA physical status distributions. The average preoperative length of stay decreased significantly from 7.0 to 1.9 days in the CEA group and from 9.0 to 2.8 days in the LER group. This reduction in the length of stay was associated with a cost-savings of $900 per patient and did not have an adverse effect on patient outcome. We conclude that outpatient preoperative evaluation clinics reduce the cost and length of stay in vascular surgery patients. IMPLICATIONS: We found that outpatient preoperative evaluation and same-day admission were associated with a decrease of 4.5 days in the preoperative length of stay for carotid endarterectomy and lower-extremity revascularization. This was not accompanied by increased mortality and led to hospital cost-savings of approximately $900 per patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pollard et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: