Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic inflammation is thought to play a role in childhood asthma. Thus, examination of nasal eosinophils, instead of sputum, may be useful for the diagnosis of not only eosinophil-positive rhinitis but also persistent asthma. Nasal eosinophil examination is a routine for the diagnosis of nasal eosinophil-positive rhinitis in patients with rhinorrhea symptoms. This retrospective study investigated whether testing for nasal discharge eosinophils is useful for diagnosing childhood allergic asthma and whether nasal discharge eosinophils are predictive of persistent asthma. METHODS: = 180) with at least 3 recurrent episodes of respiratory symptoms and bronchodilator inhalation improvements at intervals of ≥1 week were divided into the asthma group and the nonasthma group, and the presence or absence of nasal discharge eosinophils was examined by age. Correlations between nasal discharge eosinophils and other predictive factors for persistent asthma were also examined. However, none of the asthma patient groups had any significant changes between the 0-1-year-old and older groups. This pattern was similar for other risk factors, showing correlations between nasal discharge eosinophils and other predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for nasal discharge eosinophils with asthma symptoms increases with age. Nasal discharge eosinophils with asthma symptoms may be a predictive factor for persistent asthma. This trial is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials (registration number UMIN000030776).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murayama et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: