Why the study?
Current CT analysis for pulmonary hypertension in COPD relies on visual findings that can cause reproducibility failure, highlighting a need for quantified objective criteria.
Does automated analysis of computed tomography parameters predict pulmonary hypertension and outcomes in patients with COPD?
Does automated analysis of computed tomography parameters predict pulmonary hypertension and outcomes in patients with COPD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated analysis of CT parameters may offer an objective, non-invasive method to assess pulmonary hypertension in patients with COPD, overcoming the reproducibility issues of visual assessment.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Reference standard method to diagnose PH is right heart catheterization. Several non-invasive imaging techniques have been employed in the detection of PH. Among them, computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly used for phenotyping and detecting complications of COPD. Several CT findings have also been described in patients with severe PH. Nevertheless, CT analysis is currently based on visual findings which can lead to reproducibility failure. Therefore, there is a need for quantification in order to assess objective criteria. In this review, progresses in automated analyses of CT parameters and their values in predicting PH and COPD outcomes are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coste et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: