An analysis of the structure of the (110) surface of GaP is performed by comparing dynamical calculations of elastic low-energy electron diffraction (ELEED) intensities with those measured at $T=300$ K. Prior analyses of ELEED intensities from compound semiconductor surfaces are extended by considering both energy-independent (Slater) and energy-dependent (Hara) models of the exchange potential and by utilizing R-factor methods to assess the quality of the description of the measured intensities by the calculated ones. A description of the measured intensities is achieved which is as good as the best obtained earlier for analogous surfaces of other compound semiconductors: i.e., GaAs(110), InSb(110), InP(110), and ZnTe(110). The resulting best-fit structures consist of single-layer reconstructions characterized by a rotation angle of ω₁=25^∘±3^∘ and a relaxation of the rotated top layer toward the substrate by 0.1 ±{} 0.05 {}. The top layer reconstruction is essentially identical to that for GaAs(110) and InSb(110), but relaxed 0.05 {} closer to the substrate. In contrast to these two surfaces, however, no evidence is obtained for second-layer reconstructions on GaP(110), a result which may be due to the fact that the ELEED intensity data for GaP(110) were acquired at $T=300$ K, whereas those for GaAs(110) and InSb(110) were obtained at $T=150$ K.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duke et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: