Studies over the last 50 years have consistently shown that survey respondents overreport their participation in American national elections (Abelson, Loftus & Greenwald, 1992; Clausen, 1968; Parry & Crossley, 1950; Presser, Traugott & Traugott, 1990; Silver, Anderson & Abramson, 1986; Traugott & Katosh, 1979). Similar results were reported in Britain (Swaddle & Heath, 1989), Sweden (Granberg & Holmberg, 1991), New Zealand (Karp & Banducci, 1999), and Norway (Waldahl & Aardal, 2000). Overreporting is a widespread democratic phenomenon. For example, ANES data reveal that between 13% and 41% of nonvoters report that they have voted in national elections when in fact they have not (Belli, Traugott, & Beckmann, 2001). Karp and Brockington find that overreporting among nonvoters ranges from 18.7% in Swedish regional elections to 26.2% in national elections. In Britain, the national numbers are similar, somewhat lower than in Norway (35%), U.S. presidential elections (40.1%), and in New Zealand (42.4%) (Karp & Brockington, 2005).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waismel-Manor et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: